Thursday, November 26, 2009

In Which We Learn We've Been Banned in China

Breaking news: Wronging Rights has been banned in China.

On this bright Thanksgiving morning, blogger Codrin Arsene of A Romanian in Africa informs us that Africa Unchained and Wronging Rights are both on the wrong side of the Great Firewall of China. He writes:
"Way to go man! Not many foreign bloggers (i.e. not Chinese) do work that’s notable enough to make the Chinese state add their website to the forbidden list. So, I guess, congratulations are in order."

Gosh, we're just so flattered to even be nominated as a Threat to Chinese Democracy. To be considered in the same category as so many other amazing banned blogs is just incredible. We'd like to thank the Academy...

Happy Thanksgiving, everyone!

(Thanks to @ryanbriggs for bringing this to our attention.)
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

Sunday, November 22, 2009

What Happens If the Foreign Aid Bubble Bursts?

A couple of months ago, I asked for your thoughts on why markets freak us out sometimes. Or, more specifically, why they freak us out sometimes, and not others:
"I don't think it's an actual discomfort with exchanging goods or services for money. We all engage in market transactions all the time, every day. Markets are where we get everything from our toothpaste to our cheesy Richard Curtis movies, but I don't think many people feel oppressed or exploited every time they buy a tube of Colgate Total."

My favorite response to the post was the very first comment, from Ryan Briggs. He suggested that, in every society, there is a category of "citizenship goods" that are perceived as the right of all citizens, regardless of their ability to pay. He used the examples of water and health care, noting that, in his native Canada, "Most people realize that a market-run health system may be overall more efficient, but they resist it because of the fact that poor people in such a system would likely get worse care (if they got care at all). Personal disgust with inequality outweighs abstract aggregate gains in efficiency."

It seems like this is an idea that's worth exploring further, especially in the context of aid work, no? The perception of something as a citizenship good is an incredibly powerful force, and can lead to hugely different ways of approaching the same policy issue.

Example: Have you ever driven through France? They have incredible motorways throughout the country -new, shiny, low-traffic, and in many cases coated with some sort of fancy low-friction material that dramatically cuts down on noise pollution. But they are EXPENSIVE: the tolls on the nine-hour drive from Paris to Nice come to nearly 70 euros. (And that's before you add in the costs of gas, roadside snacks, or wear and tear on your tiny French car...)

Compare that to the United States, where we generally assume that we take a more free-market approach to things than our cheese-eating surrender brethren. Can you imagine the outcry if people had to shell out $115 to drive from Minneapolis to Champaign, IL? Or $50 to drive from New York to Boston? No? Here's a hint: the outcry would be a loud, vehement one. Americans think of roads as our god-given right, and in our political culture, "god-given right" means "I shouldn't have to pay to use it."

So maybe we're not spending enough time thinking about the role of culture in debates like this. If we perceive citizenship goods as inherently community property, then it feels like extortion if we can't get access to them without paying. And if the system is perceived as the natural default, then efforts to change it seem like a nefarious plot to trick the public out of its due. (I have a sneaking suspicion that that feeling is behind a lot of the craziness whipped up by the current debate on health care reform -each side's policy proposals are perceived as evil schemes by the opposing camp, regardless of reality. "Don't let the government get its hands on my Medicare," anyone?)

Maybe this seems obvious to everyone else, but I feel like it's a point that's missing from the aid debate. Sure, we talk about "dependencies" and "capacities" and "sustainability." But those discussions are usually focused on the incentives for local producers of a good, or providers of a service, not on how aid programs change the cultural norms for consumers. If treating something as a citizenship good makes people think that it's illegitimate to purchase it on the market, then it seems like aid programs -especially those that use rights-based rhetoric- run a serious risk of creating citizenship-good-expectations, without appropriate citizenship-good-infrastructure. If that's true, and the aid programs end but aren't replaced by the local government, then the resulting distribution mechanisms will be be perceived as illegitimate. That doesn't sound like a recipe for long-term success (or political stability) to me....

What do you think? Are aid programs creating a citizenship-goods bubble? And is it going to burst?
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

Friday, November 20, 2009

WTF Friday, 11/20

From the desk of Intern Chris:
  • WTF @ Nicholas Kristof: "When you hear that foreign-aid groups just squander money or build dependency, remember that by all odds Tererai should be an illiterate, battered cattle-herd in Zimbabwe...She seemed destined to be one more squandered African asset." Dude is seriously talking about destiny right now?
  • From the "shit i could not make up" department: You can read this all in the article, but I really feel the need to work this one out for my own closure. Ok, so, Qaddafi, who has some sort of oil contracts in exchange for colonial reparations deal with Berlusconi, had an Italian modeling agency find attractive women to attend an "elegant soirée," and when they got there, he gave a 45 minute speech about Islam, handed them Korans and his own political manifesto, and offered to pay for them to go to Mecca. Like, that actually happened, because men, and, ya know, non-models, are not really candidates for that sort of thing, but instead, female models that you trick into coming. Cool, got it.
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

"A selfish desire for equality": Israeli Police Arrest Woman For Wearing a Tallit and Reading From the Torah at the Western Wall

This shit makes me glad to have Birthright Virginia, not just Birthright Israel. From Haaretz:
"Police on Wednesday arrested a woman who was praying at the Western Wall in Jerusalem, due to the fact that she was wrapped in a prayer shawl (tallit).

The woman was visiting the site with the religious women's group "Women of the Wall" to take part in the monthly Rosh Hodesh prayer.

Police said they arrested the woman in the wake of a High Court ruling, which states that the public visiting the Western Wall is obligated to dress in accordance with the site's dress code."

According to Israel's conservative rabbis, the real problem here is that uppity women don't know their place.
"Last week Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the Shas party's spiritual leader, said during his weekly sermon that the women in the feminist movement are "stupid" and act the way they do out of a selfish desire for equality, not "for heavens' sake."

Rabbi Ovadia also said about the groups' custom to pray at the Western Wall that "there are stupid women who come to the Western Wall, put on a tallit (prayer shawl), and pray," and added that they should be condemned."

Gee, aren't the Jews lucky to have their own state? I don't know about you, but as a woman who has more than once wrapped myself in a prayer shawl and read from the Torah in public, without getting even a little bit arrested for it, I sure am reassured to know that the Land of Israel is there to protect us Chosen People if the going should get rough.

Or maybe that's just my "selfish desire for equality" speaking.

hat tip: Goldblog.
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Creepy Christian Evangelicals, Godless Liberal Hippies Agree: Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Bill Is Bad News

Well, it's official. Absolutely nobody thinks Uganda's proposed Anti-Homosexuality Bill is a good idea.

The bill, which would double-plus-criminalize (yes, that's the technical term for criminalizing something that's already criminal) homosexuality, criminalize failure on the part of a relevant authority to report another's homosexuality (!!), and mandate the death penalty for acts of"aggravated homosexuality," has already been decried by France, the U.S., Human Rights Watch, and a bunch of people outside the Ugandan mission to the U.N. today.

But now gay-conversion-superstars Exodus International (motto: "Jesus is the antidote to gay") have added their voices to the chorus of condemnation. According to the gay intarwebbers at queerty.com (warning: site's ads may be NSFW) Exodus's concern is just business: If Uganda's gays are executed, they lose a major market for Jesus-based conversion.

Our old pal (Ugandan Ethics and Integrity Minister) Buturo blames human rights for the resistance to the bill, noting that he is "really getting tired of this phrase human rights." You and me both, buddy.
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Dear Repressed People of Sudan: Time to Get Some of Those Arm Things

Michael Kevane, on the prospects for a Sudanese peace deal:
" At some point in the next year, the Sudanese public and the world community will be presented with a "deal", and every person concerned will have to ask whether the deal is an attempt to hoodwink the most marginalized and preserve the positions of power and wealth enjoyed by the few."
He has some guesses about what those "few" will say to get everyone else to go along with their deal, too:
- "This is the last chance. If this deal is not accepted, the future will be far worse."
- "This is the only deal possible. Either this deal is accepted or there will be no deal."
- "This deal is a reasonable compromise, good enough for everyone."
Because no people's movement can succeed without a really smashing accessory, Kevane has a fab suggestion for how to jazz up the resistance: arm thingies!!!
"So I only have one piece of advice for that Sudanese public. Get some of those arm things that are used by civil disobedience demonstrators everywhere in the world. Store them at Lubna Hussein's house, and break them out when the "deal" is announced and it doesnt contain four things:
1- Robust demobilization of NCP/SAF armed proxies in Darfur, permitting IDPs to return in security or stay in camps in security.
2- Stiff sanctions against NCP for violations of normal press freedoms and freedom of assembly.
3- Very aggressive international monitoring of elections, voter registration and referendum, enabling international backup if processes are tampered with.
4- Oil revenues into a transparent account, and out of the hands of military"
But Michael, where can the people GET themselves some arm thingies? As we all know, protester-arm-thingies are but one of the many things in which Africa is lacking. Obviously, some saintly soul must undertake Operation Thing Those Arms, Baby! ("ATTAB!"), and conduct a daring air-drop mission to deliver these vital goods to downbeaten Darfuris and subjugated South Sudanese.
Clooney? Kristof? Anyone listening?

Hat tip: Michelle.
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

Friday, November 13, 2009

WTF Friday, 11/13

From the desk of Intern Chris:
  • Charles Taylor claims former Nigerian president Olusegun Obasanjo tricked him into getting arrested. Not cool.
  • Cuban blogger, Yaoni Sanchez, faces violence from secret police. Cuban punk rocker, Gorki Aguila, "[doesn't] take this communist crap."
  • The 2009 Humanitarian Responsiveness Index seems bleak. From FP Passport: "The world is less safe for aid workers, access to needy communities in conflict is on the decline, and aid is increasingly tied to military or other strategic objectives."
  • Generally consensus on the existence of "black jails" in China: "The jails, usually makeshift lockups in hostels, apartment buildings or abandoned factories, have been well-documented by human rights groups, lawyers and the international media." Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang's thoughts: ""I can assure you there are no so-called black jails in China. We put people first, and we are an administration for the people." Well, color me convinced.
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Update: Dadaab Jobs Program & Give Work App Still Seems Legit

After I put up yesterday's post about the program that Samasource is running in Kenya's Dadaab refugee camp, reader (and intrepid boy reporter) Nick commented, expressing doubt about whether the project had actually gotten off the ground:
"Turns out the Samasource press release was premature and the innovative partnership is a total dud. I looked into this for a story and was told by CARE that the project never got off the ground because Samasource and CARE could not come to an agreement on how to do it. In the words of a CARE spokesman: "Negotiations were
initiated but not completed, so there's no ongoing project to see."
That surprised me. The Samasource website seemed fairly up to date, and the press release was from last July. So if the project wasn't actually happening yet, one would think that would have been mentioned by now, no?

Luckily, it sounds like it was our concerns that were premature, not Samasource's press release. I called and spoke to Leila Chirayath Janah, Samasource's founder, who assuaged my concerns. "While we are still in negotiations on a formal partnership with CARE," she explained, "we have already started working with 16 refugees since July, independently of care." Their website actually offers profiles of the Dadaab workers, which can be seen here. (I'm guessing that there's a glitch in the "income earned" information, though -it seems unlikely that every worker has earned exactly $3.13.)

CARE maintains the computer labs that the refugee workers are using, and also selected the refugees who are participating in the project. They're also selecting the next group of 16, who will begin training later this month. Samasource provides program training, and client relationships, but not infrastructure, so the program will only be able to reach its full capacity if more computers are added in the camps. (Currently, there are ten computers in each of the two labs.) Samasource recently got a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation that should allow them to expand the program and add 50-100 more workers in the spring of 2010, if there are enough computers by then.

Jaded aid workers who think no one reads your reports, take heart: Leila told me she was inspired to begin working in the Dadaab camp after reading an Oxfam report that highlighted the lack of livelihood opportunities for refugees there. She visited the camp, and was struck by the overwhelming feeling that "this place is hopeless," and that "the refugees were essentially trapped there." Most are Somali, and so cannot safely return home. The Kenyan government requires them to remain inside the camp, (originally built to house 90,000 people, it now holds 280,000), which denies them access to jobs, trade with the outside world, and independence. That forces the refugees to be dependent on outside aid, leaving them vulnerable to the capriciousness of international donors. To deny refugees the opportunity to work and achieve independence, Leila felt, was to deprive them of "a basic dignity in life."

Leila learned that CARE was running livelihood projects in the camp, but she found that they were not being "technology innovators." CARE's projects focused on traditional jobs that required significant physical inputs, such as ice-making (requires water), and butchery (requires cows.) Others, like making baskets for export, required not only physical inputs, but also transportation infrastructure for shipping, and access to foreign markets and buyers. Those weren't available.

However, the report also mentioned that a donor had installed two computer labs in the camp, and that young women were using them for online university work. Leila reasoned that anyone skilled enough to do university coursework would also be able to handle the jobs that her organization outsources, and so decided to set up a project there. She contacted CARE and offered to set up a pilot program at no cost to them, or even to help pay for the upkeep of the computer labs. Eventually (after she and an Stanford MBA student intern flew to Kenya in person) CARE agreed, and the pilot program began. The refugees are now working, and will receive their wages directly. (The money won't be going to fund the program, or into a generalized pool, or be given as in-kind goods: this is a job.) They will make between $1 and $2.50 per hour, depending on the speed with which they can complete the online tasks. Other refugee workers in the camp make about $0.50 to $1 per day, if they can find work at all.

So for now, I'm sticking with my initial "this seems cool" reaction, and assuming that CARE's statement to Nick was the result of some kind of communications breakdown. I called CARE myself to ask for more information, and a very nice media officer has promised that someone will get back to me soon. I'll post about their response when I get it.
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

So This Seems Pretty Cool: iPhone App to Train Refugees to Do Outsourced Tech Jobs


Samasource, a San Francisco-based nonprofit that "leverages technology to create jobs for the next billion," has partnered with CARE International on an innovative project that combines job training with job access for refugees in Kenya's Dadaab refugee camp.

CARE has equipped two technology centers in the camp with broadband links, computers, and other infrastructure. They've selected a small group of refugees who will be trained in "marketable computer and research skills," and partnered with outsourcing organizations to provide jobs. For now, that will be Dolores Labs, which "takes short simple tasks such as translation, transcription, or content moderation and serves them to workers in real-time, creating an on-demand, 24/7 workforce."

Samasource has also developed an iPhone app, Give Work, which allows fancy people with fancy phones to help with the refugee workers' training. As far as I can tell from their website, it works like this: the refugee trainee is given an "outsourced" task, such as checking the copyright restrictions on an internet-sourced photograph. The same task goes out on the Give Work network, where several iPhone users can also select it, and do the task themselves, creating a kind of crowdsourced accuracy measure of the task's "right" answer. The refugee trainee's results are compared to the crowdsourced answers. Once the refugee has developed a consistent track record of correct answers, he or she will graduate to paid outsourced jobs.

A few reasons why I think this is cool:
  1. It's not a "traditional craft." Seriously, I have had it up to here with the idea that making baskets/beads/carvings/blankets/weavings is the way out of poverty for people in the developing world. The weird Noble-Savage overtones leave a bad taste in my mouth. So does the emphasis on work for poor people that is aesthetically pleasing to the wealthy. It's all a bit Marie-Antoinette's-shepherdesses for me.
  2. It's a skill with positive externalities. I don't know how long this project or its jobs will last, but the skills this will give refugees will continue to have value even if the specific jobs evolve over time. The technical stuff will be good, but I think that the experience with Western consumer culture will be even better. The training program will expose the refugees to the way the iPhonerati approach and solve problems, which should make them more able to participate in the outsourced service economy in other ways as well. That's a tremendously valuable skill set, one I'd take over basket-weaving any day.
  3. It's cheap in the right ways. For all that the iPhone thing is a little bit gimmicky, it's a great use of technology. Getting free feedback from lots of people will not only save the cost of hiring trainers, it will also provide better quality feedback than one or two people could.
  4. It's about jobs, in refugee camps. Among the many, many, many things that I think are terrible about the "herd them into camps and leave them there forever" model of refugee-hosting, walling refugees off from legitimate jobs is one of the worst. So any program that takes the international job market directly into a refugee camp is on my good list until further notice.
I don't have an iPhone, so I can't try this app out for myself. Do any intrepid readers want to take Give Work for a spin and report back?
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

Friday, November 6, 2009

WTF Friday, 11/6

From the desk of Intern Chris:
  • Status on Putin and other Russian politicians: BALLIN'

  • Islamic countries try to ban blasphemy.

  • Guinean coup leader is "totes sorry" about massacre (hat tip to Kate's sister Emily!).

  • ICC to begin inquiry into post-election violence in Kenya, NYT to continue with useless details: "A Kenyan commission investigated the violence in October 2008 and came up with a list of several top suspects, widely believed to include some of the nation’s most powerful men. The names were sealed in a square brown paper envelope and handed over to Kofi Annan, the former secretary general of the United Nations who took on the role of peacemaker." Well, now you know.

  • Haiti has now gone through 5 Prime Ministers in 5 years (via Wide Angle). People do say variety is the spice of life.

  • Blogger suppression map. China seems to really hate the internet.
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Breaking News: Simon Mann Released

The Associated Press is reporting this morning that Simon Mann and four of the other mercenaries convicted of plotting a coup in Equatorial Guinea were freed today. Mann was sentenced last year to 34 years in the notorious Black Beach prison.

The Guardian, which describes Mann as "the Old Etonian mercenary," reports that Mann is being pardoned in part due to his need for medical treatment and has 24 hrs to leave the country
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

Monday, November 2, 2009

Now That's a Good Use of Video Cameras

Lawyers With Cameras = just awesome. Layda Negrete and Roberto Hernández, two Mexican lawyers who are now Berkeley PhD students, used a brilliant combination of lawyering and videro cameras to save an innocent man from serving decades in prison.

The Mexican justice system has only the most tenuous of connections to the actual investigation and punishment of crimes. Hardly any cases are investigated or prosecuted. And when the police and courts do get involved, they don't improve things much:
"Crooked cops regularly solve cases by grabbing the first person they find, often along with a cooked-up story from someone claiming to be an eyewitness. Prosecutors and judges play along, eager to calm a growing public outcry over high crime rates and rising violence from Mexico's war on illicit drug gangs. In practice, suspects are often presumed guilty. More than 85% of those charged with a crime are sentenced, according to Mexico's top think tank, the Center for Investigation and Development, or CIDE. [...]

Someone committing a crime in Mexico has only a two in 100 chance of getting caught and punished, according to Guillermo Zepeda, a CIDE scholar. A big reason is that just 12% of crimes are reported to the police, Mr. Zepeda says. In a big deterrent, police ask many people who report crimes for money to solve the case or become suspects themselves, Mr. Zepeda says....In more than six of every 10 cases, suspects were arrested within three hours of the crime, leaving little time for serious detective work, according to a study from CIDE. Almost none were shown an arrest warrant."
Negrete and Hernández took on the case of Antonio Zuñiga, a street vendor who was arrested for murder while out for a walk in December 2005.
"As he crossed a busy Mexico City avenue, two burly cops grabbed him from behind and shoved him into a patrol car.

So began a nightmarish journey into Mexico's legal system that seems lifted from the pages of Franz Kafka. For nearly two days, the street vendor was held incommunicado and not told why he was arrested. His questions met with hostile stares from detectives, who would say "You know what you did." He says in an interview that he only learned of the charges after walking into a holding cell and being asked by a prisoner: "Are you the guy accused of murder?"

Mr. Zuñiga, then 26, was charged in the shooting death of a gang member from his neighborhood. Ballistic tests showed Mr. Zuñiga hadn't fired a gun. Dozens of witnesses saw him working at his market stall during the time of the murder, which took place several miles away. And he had never met the victim. Still, he was found guilty by a judge at trial and sentenced to 20 years in prison."


Zuñiga,however, was relatively lucky. Hernández and Negrete realized that the lawyer who had represented Zuñiga in his original trial was a fraudster working on a forged license, and that was enough to win him a retrial. They also got permission from the trial judge to film the entire retrial, as well as interviews with witnesses. That footage became a 90-minute documentary, Presumed Guilty. What it shows is not pretty:
"When asked by one of Mr. Zuñiga's defense lawyers what evidence he has against Mr. Zuñiga, the detective in charge of the case says: "He's here (in prison), right? He must have done something." Asked by the lawyer why she was prosecuting an innocent man, the prosecutor says with a weak smile: "It's my job." [...]

The judge, Hector Palomares dons his robe this time around and sits behind a makeshift desk. Mr. Zuñiga says Mr. Palomares never emerged from his office at his first trial. [...]

At one point, the witness, Mr. Reyes, is asked by one of Mr. Zuñiga's defense lawyers to describe the three gang members whom he'd originally accused. He describes each one. Asked to describe Mr. Zuñiga, the man he later accused, he can't.

The detectives who arrested the street vendor and handled his case testified, but claimed they didn't remember anything. "We have a lot of cases," says Jose Manuel Ortega, the lead detective, shrugging his shoulders. "I can't remember all of them." Mr. Ortega declined to comment.

At the height of the retrial, Mr. Zuñiga confronts his accuser face-to-face. As the pair talk in stilted tones and pause so a stenographer can transcribe each word, the drama builds. Finally, Mr. Reyes admits he never saw who killed his cousin."

Shockingly, (or perhaps not-so-shockingly, given that the retrial was heard by the same judge who had handled the original case), Zuñiga was convicted again in the retrial. However, when Negrete and Hernández appealed the decision, they also showed the appeals court a rough cut of their documentary, and the panel was so disturbed by what it showed that they overturned the verdict. They set Mr. Zuñiga free in April of 2008.

Negrete and Hernández's work continued to make waves. They coupled their documentary with aggressive research into successful judicial reforms that had been put into place in Chile, and along with other activists they lobbied their government to put similar methods into practice in Mexico. Their success was impressive: in June of 2008, President Felipe Calderón signed a constitutional amendment that, among other things, makes trials public, and guarantees the presumption of innocence for the accused.

Go lawyers!
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

Friday, October 30, 2009

WTF Friday, 10/30

Our beloved Intern Chris tells it like it is:
  • If we can't trust our poets, who can we trust? (no one).

  • Semi-old news: British mining company 'Monterrico Metals' assets frozen after allegations of torture of protesters in Peru in 2005. No proof (yet) that they were actually "involved," but protesters say Monterrico director Andrew Bristow was giving orders. Either way, when a guy is left bleeding to death for 36 HOURS at your mining site, it's tough to give you benefit of the doubt.

  • And, just in case you thought it was just police and big business doing messed up shit. Though, and call me old fashioned, shouldn't claims about a rise in vigilantism be coupled with, say, a statistic? (sigh).

  • Too sad to be cute? Your call.

  • Somali pirates doing their best Captain Planet (not even sure if our readership gets that reference). (via Global Dashboard)
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

In Which the AP Issues a Clarification

Thanks to Enough's David Sullivan, I just noticed this:
Clarification: Sudan-US-Darfur story
The Associated Press
Tuesday, October 27, 2009; 10:46 AM

CAIRO -- In a story Sept. 11, The Associated Press quoted a representative of refugees in the Darfur region of Sudan as saying a U.S. envoy was not welcome in the region's camps. The story should have said that the refugee representative identified himself only as Abu Sharati, an informal nickname he is known by, and that he spoke on condition of anonymity because he said he feared arrest by Sudan's Arab-led government.
I'm glad to see it. Still no mention of him being a "self-appointed" representative, though...
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

The Wronging Rights Mailbag: Abu Sharati Edition

We've received a lot of comments and email about Amanda's Abu Sharati series. (Quick review: Amanda gets weirded out by mainstream media references to "refugee representative" Abu Sharati, does some digging and discovers that there is no reason to believe the quoted source is (a) a representative of refugees or (b) named Abu Sharati.)

I thought I would take a moment to respond to some of the most common reactions. In descending order of hilarity:
  1. "Amanda is a janjaweed."

  2. I can see why you'd make this mistake, given all the superficial similarities between heavily armed war criminals and my tiny, panda-obsessed, half-Jewish best friend. But she can't even ride a bicycle, let alone a camel, so I feel confident assuring you that Amanda is absolutely, definitely, probably not a janjaweed.

  3. "What's the big deal about someone claiming to speak for all refugees? Organizations like the ABA claim to speak for all you lawyer types."

  4. Sigh. Seriously? I thought Amanda did a really good job of explaining this one in the original post. Specifically: "[I]it matters because if "Abu Sharati" -whoever he really is- does not have any legitimate authority to speak on behalf of Darfur's displaced people, then presenting his views as if he does is basically just stealing."

    The ABA is a membership organization whose leaders are chosen by the members. That means that the 400,000+ ABA members have authorized the organization to speak on their behalf. It also means there's a mechanism in place in case its representatives start spouting nonsense that doesn't reflect the members' position. Now, we can quibble about whether or not it's a truly representative organization, but I think we can all agree that it is qualitatively different from a situation in which a single person, with no official sanction, claims to speak for millions of refugees and IDPs.

  5. "Hey, didn't Amanda just indirectly pwn Eric Reeves? What's going on with that guy anyway?"

  6. Excellent question.

  7. "Can we really expect mainstream journalists to get hard stuff right when they're so under-resourced?"

  8. I see Steve's point, and it does sound like being a foreign correspondent has gotten a lot more difficult lately. But the element missing from the reporting of these stories wasn't resources, it was common sense. I understand that with more staff, more time, and more money these journalists might have been able to interview more sources who could have given them more information which would have fleshed out the Abu Sharati story. But none of that was necessary to avoid this result. As many of our readers have pointed out in the comments to Amanda's post, all it would have taken was a bit of critical thinking.

  9. What about the broader context of "how journalists and the audiences they serve respond to a place where information does not flow freely?"

  10. This raises the larger point that when power is exercised to suppress information, information itself becomes power. It is not surprising that those with access to the refugee population would be leveraging this access for their own political purposes. But it makes the role of investigative reporting that much more crucial, despite the difficulty: Far away readers have almost no chance of separating out fact from message. This is why we need the press and why we need journalists to take their role and its accompanying standards seriously. Because otherwise, the information-seeking public is stuck with bloggers. And we all know no good can come of that.
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

Friday, October 23, 2009

WTF Friday, 10/23

Via Intern Chris:
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

Optional Reading

I have a guest post up over at the Stop Genocide blog. Take a look if you're interested in what's new at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal:

Checking in with the Khmer Rouge Tribunal


(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

Thursday, October 22, 2009

In Case You Were Wondering What Trent Reznor's Up To These Days

I'm sure you were all devastated by the news last month that Nine Inch Nails will no longer be touring. But don't worry, Trent Reznor has found something else to occupy his time: closing Gitmo.

In case you've been living under a rock for the past few years, Guatanamo Bay is a place where, in violation of all standards of moral decency and international law, the work of innocent musicians is cruelly subverted for the purposes of breaking detainees. I know, I know, those poor musicians.

Well, Reznor and other American recording artists, including R.E.M., Pearl Jam, Roseanne Cash, and the Roots, have declared that they will be victimized no longer. They've joined the campaign to close the detention facility and are filing a FOIA request for any documents detailing the use of loud music to aid interrogation.*

Man, don't you just get a warm fuzzy feeling when you hear about oppressed people finally standing up for their rights?

(Thanks for the tip, Payal!)

*Apparently, the British are way ahead of us on this one, with a dedicated NGO that aims to "end the suffering caused by music torture."
**Photo of Trent Reznor by Rob Sheridan taken from the Nine Inch Nails wikipedia Entry.
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

Friday, October 16, 2009

WTF Friday, 10/16

[Via Intern Chris:]

Hey everyone! It's me, Chris! Katmanda has asked me to share some internet highlights with you that are basically links that they would have found if they weren't so busy with jobs and lives. Fortunately, I think those things are overrated, so here ya go, my first ever "WTF Friday."

  • Dude says "no doubt" Obama deserved Nobel because he is popular and gave a speech in Egypt once. Can't argue with that! I'm wearing an Egypt shirt today so I think I'll be up for it next year.
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)

Friday, October 9, 2009

WTF Friday

In honor of Barack Obama's Nobel Peace Prize (where Nobel Peace Prize apparently = scholarship for promising young potential peace-promoters) win*, we're debuting a new feature: WTF Friday.

We're also introducing a new member of Team WrongingRights. Please welcome Intern Chris!

Actually, Intern Chris has been around for a few months, doing yeoman's work helping us make sure no mention of human rights on the internet goes unpunished. Because he's proved so awesome at this, we've decided to have him digest his top few "WTF?!" moments of each week for you. So look for him here next Friday, and be nice.


*The award for best response so far goes to Farhad Manjoo of Slate for his application of the Kanye meme: "Yo Barack, I'm really happy for you and imma let you finish, but Morgan Tsvangira[i] was one [of] the most peaceful dudes ever."
(If we've said there's more after the jump, or you want to see comments, you should probably click here)